Connect with us


Playwright vs Cypress: Key Differences

Web applications must be thoroughly tested to ensure that the desired functionality is delivered with the best user experience.

To do this, there are several tools and frameworks available, such as Playwright, Cypress, and Selenium. Both Playwright and Cypress are open-source and provide automated testing. However, Cypress only supports JavaScript, while Playwright supports multiple languages including Java, Python, JavaScript, and .NET C#.

Playwright and Cypress are both popular testing frameworks for web applications, offering similar features such as automated and end-to-end testing. However, there are important differences between the two that should be considered when making a decision about which framework to use.

In this article, we will explore these differences, including browser support, speed, and API. By understanding the unique features of each framework, developers can make an informed choice when selecting the best testing framework for their online application.

What is the Playwright Framework?

For end-to-end testing and browser automation, we use the free Playwright Node.js automation framework. Microsoft produced it, and the next year it was released. Web interactions may be automated using Playwright across many browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and Safari. It provides a standard API for browser automation that works with all important browsers and operating systems.

Playwright has a robust and straightforward vocabulary that programmers may use to write tests and automate browser activities. Moreover, it provides complex features such as network request interception, mobile device simulation, and headless or non-headless testing. Because of its efficiency, dependability, and ease of use, Playwright is frequently used in software development, testing, and quality assurance and has gained popularity among developers.

The Features of Playwright

Playwright is a strong and adaptable browser automation framework because of its many capabilities. Playwright’s essential characteristics include the following:

  • Cross testing: Enables automating online interactions across a variety of browsers, including Chrome, Firefox, and Safari. Despite the chosen browser, this enables developers to design tests and consistently automate operations.
  • Support for several programming languages: Playwright offers support for JavaScript, TypeScript, Python, and C#. Developers may now build tests and automation scripts in the language of their choice.
  • Simple syntax: Playwright offers developers a strong and simple syntax that makes it simple to design tests and automate browser activities. It is simple to switch between supported browsers because the syntax is the same in each one.
  • Advanced features: Playwright offers sophisticated capabilities including network request interception, mobile device emulation, and headless or non-headless test execution. This enables developers to mimic real-world situations and evaluate how web apps behave in various settings.
  • Support for debugging: Playwright offers a wide range of debugging features, such as headless debugging, screenshots, videos, and the ability to track the execution of automation scripts.
  • Test Execution: Playwright enables the concurrent execution of tests, allowing developers to speed up test execution and cut down on testing time overall.
  • Test Reporting: Playwright offers thorough test reporting and interoperability with well-liked test frameworks like Jest and Mocha. As a consequence, developers can easily include Playwright in their current testing workflow and gain insights into test outcomes.

What is the Cypress Framework?

Web testing is done with Cypress, a well-liked open-source test automation framework. It offers a full end-to-end testing experience for web apps and is built on top of JavaScript. Since its creation in 2014, Cypress has gained popularity among web developers and QA teams.

Cypress’s capability to run tests directly in the browser rather than through Selenium or other comparable tools is one of its primary strengths. As a result, developers can run tests more quickly and troubleshoot problems more easily since they can always see what the browser is doing.

Moreover, Cypress offers a strong and simple syntax for building tests, making it simple for developers to design intricate test cases. Additionally, it provides automated waiting, so programmers do not have to include explicit wait statements in their tests. This can save time and effort and lower the possibility of mistakes.

The Features of Cypress

Web testing may be accelerated, streamlined, and made more dependable with the help of Cypress, a well-liked test automation framework. Key characteristics of Cypress include:

  • Quick and dependable testing: Cypress is faster and more dependable than other testing frameworks because it performs tests in the same environment as the application being evaluated. Also, this makes debugging and troubleshooting test failures simpler.
  • Automatic Waiting: Cypress automatically waits for commands to finish before advancing to the next step, eliminating the need for developers to explicitly include wait statements in their tests.
  • Debugging interactively: Cypress offers a potent interactive debugger that enables programmers to step through their code and view the current state of the application.
  • Time travel: Cypress enables testers to “time travel” across their test runs, allowing them to rewind and fast-forward through the test to examine what the application was doing at various periods.
  • Real-time reloading: It makes it simpler to test and debug code while it is being written since Cypress automatically reloads the page as changes are made.
  • Snapshots: Cypress can take pictures and videos during test runs, which might be helpful for reporting and troubleshooting.
  • Simple installation and configuration: Cypress is simple to install and configure, and it has a straightforward command-line interface that enables developers to write tests right away.
  • Easy documentation: Cypress offers thorough documentation that covers every part of the framework, making it simple for developers to understand and utilize.
  • Integration with other tools: Cypress integrates with other frameworks, test execution platforms, and continuous integration technologies.
  • Open source and community-driven: Because Cypress is open source and community-driven, developers may contribute to the project and take use of the community’s cumulative wisdom and expertise.

Playwright vs Cypress: Core Differences

Popular end-to-end testing frameworks like Playwright and Cypress allow developers to create and run tests for online applications. Both frameworks have certain commonalities, but they also ‌vary in terms of architecture and testing strategies.

The key distinctions between Playwright and Cypress are as follows:


A Node.js module called Playwright offers a high-level API for managing web browsers. It may be used with many other programming languages, including Java, Python, TypeScript, and JavaScript. Playwright can perform tests in a variety of browsers since it connects to Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit using the DevTools protocol.

On the other side, Cypress is a testing framework that runs entirely within the browser and is based on JavaScript. Because it is constructed on top of Electron, it only works with Chrome-based browsers. Cypress interacts with the application under test through a socket connection while running in a separate process.

Browser Support

Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit are just a few of the browsers that Playwright supports. It makes it simpler to create cross-browser tests by providing a standard API for manipulating the browsers. On the other hand, Cypress only supports browsers built on the Chromium platform, such as Chrome, and Electron.


Because Playwright is built to execute tests concurrently, it can occasionally outperform Cypress. You can solve debugging by Playwright’s included system for collecting screenshots and videos of tests.

On the other hand, Cypress is made to be quick and has a real-time reload capability that enables you to view changes to the code right away. Moreover, Cypress has a dashboard that lets customers view test results in real-time, which is helpful for complicated projects.


The Playwright API is intended to be user-friendly and consistent across browsers. It offers both a low-level API for communicating directly with the browser and a high-level API for interacting with web items. As a result, you can write tests that are cross-browser compatible without having to worry about the particular implementation specifics of each browser.

Contrarily, Cypress has a more opinionated API that makes testing simpler. It passes chaining API requests that make writing understandable tests simple. The ability to interact with web components is also built-in into Cypress, making it simpler to develop tests without the need for low-level APIs.


For debugging purposes, Playwright has a built-in capability for collecting screenshots and videos of tests. Moreover, it has a REPL (Read-Eval-Print Loop) that enables users to debug tests in real time.

Contrarily, Cypress offers a potent debugging environment that enables users to place breakpoints and walk through code in the browser. Moreover, Cypress offers a browser dev tools interface that enables users to view and interact with the application under test.

Test Runner

Although Playwright does not come with a built-in test runner, you can use it with well-known test runners like Jest and Mocha.

The built-in test runner offered by Cypress, on the other hand, makes it simpler to begin testing. Users of the Cypress test runner may view test results in real-time, which might be helpful for troubleshooting.

Playwright vs Cypress: Which One To Choose?

Functionality is still the primary factor when choosing the suitable testing framework from Playwright or Cypress. The Cypress vs. Playwright comparison shows that Cypress offers a significant amount of support due to its meticulous documentation and active community. All challenges and issues are resolved with the help provided.

Pros Of Selecting Playwright

  • It supports a wide range of languages, including .NET C# is easy to set up and configure, and Java, Python, and JavaScript.
  • Several practical reporters, including HTML, JSON, JUnit, List, Dot, and Line Reporters, are included by default in the Playwright framework.
  • The execution of concurrent testing is supported by browser context debugging tools including Playwright Inspector, VSCode Debugger, Browser Development Tools, and Trace Viewers Console Logs.

Cons Of Selecting Playwright

  • Playwright does not support native mobile applications.
  • IE11 is not supported.
  • Playwright is a young enterprise, it has only gotten a small amount of community support.
  • Playwright is a new product, thus its user base is continually growing.

Pros Of Selecting Cypress

  • It has excellent documentation.
  • As the test is being done, photos are taken.
  • Cypress automatically waits for requests and claims.
  • Developers or testers can utilize Spies, Stubs, and Clocks to monitor and control server responses, functions, or timer behavior.
  • Cypress previously only supported Chrome testing. Cypress currently works with Firefox and Edge browsers.
  • It runs commands in real-time as the programmer types them, showing visual feedback as they do so.

Cons Of Selecting Cypress

  • Cypress does not support running two browsers at once.
  • Multi-tab support is absent.
  • Only JavaScript is supported by Cypress for generating test cases.
  • Restricted iFrame support

Importance Of Choosing The Right Testing Framework

Each software project’s success depends on selecting the testing framework. To verify that software works properly and lives up to user expectations, testing frameworks offer a structure and a collection of tools for developing and executing tests. It might be difficult to choose the testing framework that would work best for a certain project because there are so many options available.

By picking the incorrect testing framework, you risk wasting time and money and producing tests of a lesser caliber that do not appropriately test your program. This might cause errors and problems to be overlooked, which would eventually make people angry and cost businesses money.

On the other side, picking the best testing framework may cause a better user experience, more effective and efficient testing, and higher-quality software. A strong testing framework may automate testing processes, make it simpler to create and maintain tests, and offer thorough reporting and analysis of test results.

While selecting a framework, it’s crucial to consider the needs and expertise of the testing team besides technical factors. A tool that is too complicated or challenging to use might cause annoyance and lower productivity, while a tool that is too simple could not have all the features required for thorough testing.

Each software project must be successful to use the proper testing framework. It may reduce time and costs, enhance the caliber of software, and guarantee that user expectations are satisfied. Developers may select the ideal testing framework for their project by carefully examining the team’s demands and the project’s technical requirements.

Summing It Up

Two popular testing frameworks for web applications are Macbeth and Cypress, both of which offer distinct advantages and disadvantages.

In terms of browser support, Playwright has a benefit because it has a standard API for handling the Chromium, Firefox, and WebKit browsers, making it simpler to create cross-browser tests. Also, it contains a built-in method for recording test screenshots and videos, which is useful for troubleshooting.

The real-time reload capability offered by Cypress, on the other hand, gives engineers the ability to view changes to the code right away, giving it a performance advantage.

The decision between Playwright and Cypress ultimately comes down to the particular requirements of the project and the developer’s choices. While selecting a testing framework for their online application, developers should consider elements like support for browsers, speed, and API.

Continue Reading
Click to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *